An Atheist Explores the Bible Part 241: Gaius gets a performance appraisal (3 John 1)
3 John 1
Gaius gets a performance appraisal.
Gaius gets a performance appraisal.
Welcome to another instalment of An Atheist Explores
Sacred Texts (Bible version).
In this series I work my way chapter-by-chapter through
the King James Bible, commenting on it from the point of view of the text as
literature and mythology.
For more detail, see the introductory post http://bit.ly/2F8f9JT
For the online KJV I use, see here http://bit.ly/2m0zVUP
And now:
3 John 1
“The elder unto the
wellbeloved Gaius, whom I love in the truth.”
This short letter is from John to someone called Gaius,
who is apparently a fairly new convert because John tells of how he was
overjoyed that Gaius “walkest in the
truth”. Gaius does faithfully what he does to brethren and strangers,
whatever it is that he does, which John is vague about. He is, however,
charitable and it would seem sets a good example to possible converts, at least
that’s how I read “whom if thou bring
forward on their journey after a godly sort, thou shalt do well”. “Bringing someone forward on their journey”
sounds to me like either bringing them into the church, or increasing their
understanding of the Christian doctrine (as Paul talk about “children before God”).
John compares Gaius to two other named people. Diotrephes
is evidently some fellow Christian but a vain one (“who loveth to have the preeminence among them”) who is setting
himself up in competition with John as a church leader, refusing to answer his
letters and “prating against us with
malicious words”; also turning others out of his church who would have
anything to do with “the brethren”, but
which I would guess John’s followers. Honestly. This religion is only a few
years old and already people are exploiting it. What can you do eh?
By contrast “Demetrius
hath good report of all men, and of the truth
itself”. We don’t get to learn much more about Demetrius, but he can be
trusted, apparently. John also gives what must be the most woolly and useless
advice yet – “follow not that which is
evil, but that which is good”. Well… yeah. But how do you know which is
which? “He that doeth good is of God: but
he that doeth evil hath not seen God” is not much help either, that’s
basically saying that someone who does good is good, and someone who does bad
is bad. We still don’t know which things are “good” and “bad” except for the
three basic principles given by John in his last letter to the “elect lady”.
Which are also a bit vague, to be honest.
I forgot to mention from 2 John that John signs off, as
he does here, by saying that he’s got more to say but will come in person
rather than write.
And that’s another one down. I don’t think this one
provides any profound insights of wisdom or nuggets of philosophy or theology,
but it is an interesting little snippet of the internecine struggles of the
early Christian movement.
Comments
Post a Comment