An Atheist Explores the Qur'an Part 51: A Disappointing Lack of Humanoid Crows (Crowling/Crouching (al-Jathiyah))
Crowling/Crouching
(al-Jathiyah) 1-37
A Disappointing Lack of Humanoid Crows.
We are also told that “Then We set you upon a clear course of the Law; so follow it”. Except that largely so far there hasn’t been a clear course of the Law set down in the Qur’an. There’s a bit about not disinheriting orphans, and those convoluted inheritance laws, but nothing along the lines of Leviticus that clearly delineates God’s Law. This surah is chronologically the 65th, so perhaps in numbers 1-50 there is something that I’ve not yet come to.
A Disappointing Lack of Humanoid Crows.
Welcome to the next instalment of An Atheist Explores Sacred Texts
(Qur’an version).
In this series I work my way chapter-by-chapter through the
Qur’an, commenting on it from the point of view of the text as literature and
mythology.
For more detail, see the introductory post https://bit.ly/2ApLDy0
For the online Qur’an that I use, see here http://al-quran.info and http://quran.com
Crouching (al-Jathiyah)
1-20
“And in
your creation [too], and whatever animals that He scatters
abroad, there are signs for a people who have certainty.”
Before I began this read-through I set up a
series of folders, one for each chapter. The various chapter names were
interesting and evocative, but this one stuck in my mind – who or what is (a)
crowling? It sounds like some kind of crow-like creature, a kenku perhaps. Or
some strange noise that’s a cross between crowing and growling. It looks like,
sadly, it’s a spelling error and probably ought to be “crawling”, since
alternative translations of al-Jathiyah are “Kneeling” and “Crouching”.
Which is all a bit dull, and actually it’s like most of the exciting sounding surah titles already – they turn out to
be something fairly mundane and referenced once in one verse. Although, to be
fair, some have lived up to the name, usually ones about people, and The
Elevations was cool.
The surah
begins with a familiar argument that the existence of things proves the
existence of God for “those who have
certainty”, which seems like a circular argument. If you already think that
because it rains it must be God that does it, then yes, you will have the
“reason” to make that deduction. And of course if you *don’t* think that, then “as
for those who defy the signs of their Lord,
for them is a painful punishment due to defilement”.
Yes, believe or die. No, sorry, believe or suffer for eternity.
We are also told that “Then We set you upon a clear course of the Law; so follow it”. Except that largely so far there hasn’t been a clear course of the Law set down in the Qur’an. There’s a bit about not disinheriting orphans, and those convoluted inheritance laws, but nothing along the lines of Leviticus that clearly delineates God’s Law. This surah is chronologically the 65th, so perhaps in numbers 1-50 there is something that I’ve not yet come to.
Crouching 21-37
“Do those who have perpetrated misdeeds suppose
that We shall treat them as those who have faith and do righteous deeds, their life and death
being equal? Evil is the judgement that they make!”
The rest of this chapter is really just
Pascal’s Wager; the righteous get rewarded and the non-believers get punished,
so it’s foolish not to believe. Although it seems like it’s one of those things
that you can’t help anyway, since a non-believer is one “whom Allah has led astray knowingly, and set a seal upon his
hearing and his heart, and put a blindfold on his sight?
So who will guide him after Allah?”
So if Allah has decided to stop the non-believer from believing, how on earth
can they hope ot be saved? That’s a kind of divine version of “Stop hitting
yourself”.
I had to laugh at the verse where the
non-believers are made to say “There is
nothing but the life of this world:
we live and we die, and nothing but time
destroys us” because the rebuttal is “But they do not have any knowledge of
that, and they only make conjectures”. Which
is exactly the same arguments you can hear from American Fundies against
evolution today. And yet, somehow, they miss the irony that the argument
presented here is that an unseen and invisible super-powerful entity will
punish or reward everyone the ever lived sometime in the distant future when
everything ends. Because *that* can’t possibly be conjecture.
Well, I’m disappointed by the complete lack of
black feathers in that chapter.
Comments
Post a Comment