An Atheist Explores the Qur'an Part 85: Soul-Stealing Angels and The Vagueness of Prophecies (The Wresters (al-Nazi’at))
The
Wresters (al-Nazi’at) 1-48
Soul-Stealing Angels and The Vagueness of Prophecies.
The latter half of this surah retreads very familiar ground – since God created everything it’s no problem for Him to end things and set up afterlife punishments and rewards (you know the drill by now). Fire or Garden, you made your choice long ago and it’s too late to complain about it when you get resurrected, yada yada yada.
Soul-Stealing Angels and The Vagueness of Prophecies.
Welcome to the next instalment of An Atheist Explores Sacred Texts
(Qur’an version).
In this series I work my way chapter-by-chapter through the
Qur’an, commenting on it from the point of view of the text as literature and
mythology.
For more detail, see the introductory post https://bit.ly/2ApLDy0
For the online Qur’an that I use, see here http://al-quran.info and http://quran.com
The Wresters
(al-Nazi’at) 1-24
“By those
[angels] who wrest [the soul] violently, by those who draw [it] out gently”
Now here’s a cool concept – angels that draw out the soul at
death; some do so gently but others rip it from the body. Alternative titles
for this chapter are“(Soul-)Snatchers, Extractors, The Angelic Pullers, The
Forceful Chargers, The Pluckers, The Soul-Snatchers, Those That Rise, Those Who
Pull and Withdraw, Those Who Tear Out”. It makes me think of the Soul Hunters
from Babylon 5 – an alien race drawn to the moment of a person’s death to
collect the “soul” (which in this case might be a personality engram, the show
is deliberately vague) so as to preserve the thoughts and memories of great
thinkers.
I love the idea of angels that rip out your soul; I think it
belongs with the other fantasy concepts I’ve currently culled from the Qur’an.
What I’ll do with them, I don’t yet know.
Other angels are described as those that “swim smoothly” and “direct
the affairs [of creature]”. Then we get a time “when the Quaker quakes and is followed by the Successor”. According
to the footnotes - “Apparently, ‘the
Quaker’ and ‘the Successor’ refer to the first and the second blasts of the
Trumpet sounded by Isrāfīl on the Day of Resurrection”. I like that even
Muslim commentators have to say “apparently” when referring to obscure titles
in the Qur’an. It’s not just ignorant kafirs
like me that don’t know what’s going on.
Anyway, the Quaker and the Successor call the dead from their
graves, who are surprised at having been awakened. And as proof that this will
happen, the reader is referred to the story of Moses against Pharaoh, briefly,
where Pharaoh “denied and disobeyed”
after Moses shows him “the greatest sign”.
Well, at least that wasn’t really vague or anything.
The
Wresters 25-48
“Is it you
whose creation is more prodigious or the sky
which He has built?”The latter half of this surah retreads very familiar ground – since God created everything it’s no problem for Him to end things and set up afterlife punishments and rewards (you know the drill by now). Fire or Garden, you made your choice long ago and it’s too late to complain about it when you get resurrected, yada yada yada.
Finally the chapter ends with instructions to
the Prophet in case “They ask you
concerning the Hour, “When will it set in, considering your frequent mention
of it?””
Which is a fair point, and not one I’d thought about so far.
Remember in the Bible that it’s a bit confusing when the “Kingdom of God” is
supposed to arrive (let alone *what* the “Kingdom of God” is supposed to be);
Jesus mentions it coming to pass “before this generation has ended”, but we
also get some suitable vagueness about “not knowing the hour”.
So it makes me wonder if the Prophet had any kind of imminent
doomsday teaching in mind when he was spreading his message, or if his idea was
also that it could come at any time – soon, or thousands of years in the
future, but it will happen. The answer here leans towards the latter, the “know
not the hour” concept - “The day they see
it, it shall be as if they had not stayed [in the world] except for an evening or
forenoon”. Which in many ways is the safer bet. If
you give a definite date for Doomsday, you’ll look foolish when the day comes
and goes with nothing happening (although, oddly, that never seems to stop
these Doomsday Cultist types, they just mutter something about changing
calenders and people still believe them).
Comments
Post a Comment