An Atheist Explores the Qur'an Part 62: A Bias Towards Right-Handed Males. Plus: What, I Was Supposed To Take This Seriously? (The Imminent (al-Waqi’ah))
The
Imminent (al-Waqi’ah) 1-96
A Bias Towards Right-Handed Males. Plus: What, I Was Supposed To Take This Seriously?
It’s made by God, apparently, and not the process of spermatogenesis involving Leydig and Sertoli cells. Oh, and another good example of how the Qur’an assumes that its audience is male.
A Bias Towards Right-Handed Males. Plus: What, I Was Supposed To Take This Seriously?
Welcome to the next instalment of An Atheist Explores Sacred Texts
(Qur’an version).
In this series I work my way chapter-by-chapter through the
Qur’an, commenting on it from the point of view of the text as literature and
mythology.
For more detail, see the introductory post https://bit.ly/2ApLDy0
For the online Qur’an that I use, see here http://al-quran.info and http://quran.com
The Imminent
(al-Waqi’ah) 1-20
“When the
Imminent [Hour]
befalls —there is no denying that it will befall— [it will be] lowering,
exalting.”
The “Imminent Hour” is
the Day of Judgement – I like that the Qur’an brooks no disagreement that it
will occur. “No,” it says, “it will, you can’t deny it.” No need to offer any
proof other than the assertion, because It’s Written. I like the poetry of “lowering, exalting”, because of the
different effects on what are described as three groups, the People of the
Right Hand, the People of the Left Hand “and
the Foremost Ones are the foremost ones”. Yes. They would be.
First of all we get a description of the reward of the Foremost
Ones, reclining on brocaded couches, “waited
upon by immortal youths” and given wine that doesn’t make you drunk or give
you a hangover. (“which
neither causes them headache nor stupefaction”). If this is the case, I
can’t quite fathom why some sects of Islam forbid alcohol. In order to
appreciate heavenly wine, you’d probably need to cultivate a taste for earthly
wine, I would have thought, otherwise by what yardstick would you know it was
any good? God could be serving you up some cheap old plonk and you’d have to
say “Mmm, lovely” because you’ve been told that it’s the best ever and you’d
feel stupid for saying you didn’t like it.
The
Imminent 21-40
“And the People of the Right Hand —what are the People of the Right Hand?”
Before we get to the People of the Right Hand, we learn that the
Foremost Ones are given “wide-eyed houris”
as a reward. Which still raises the question of if women even get to go to
Paradise.
Anyway, the Right-Handers get something similar, under shady lote
trees, with fruit, but in this case they are given virginal spouses made from
dead women. How this differs from big-eyed houris, I don’t know. It sounds like
you don’t need to marry a big-eyed houri and can use and discard them as you
see fit, whereas for a mere Right-Hander you have to keep what you buy.
Oh, and I’m not joking about the dead women part – “We have created them with a special
creation, and made them virgins, loving, of a like age, for the People of the
Right Hand. A multitude from the former [generations] and a multitude from the
latter [ones].”
Although, it’s possible that the “multitudes” refer to the Right-Handers rather than the source of
the virgin brides. Nevertheless, these virgin brides are specially made. “Of a like age” raises an interesting
question – is Paradise full of old people, like Florida, or do you get to
choose what age you are once you die? I mean, the whole sales pitch here is
towards physical rewards rather than anything spiritual, so it’s evidently
meant to be a rebirth kind of thing rather than living as glowing energy
floating around the Godhead kind of thing.
The
Imminent 41-60
“And the
People of the Left Hand —what are the People of the Left Hand?”
So the Foremost are evidently the good
believers, and I guess the Right-Handers are those who were good enough but
not, I don’t know, holy men or something. And so the Left-Handers are the bad
people who end up drinking boiling water and choking on a black smoke. “Then indeed, you, astray
deniers, will surely eat from the Zaqqūm tree”. Ah yes,
the Zaqqum, the Tree of Hell with fruits like rotting heads that eat you from
the inside. I’m so stealing that idea.
Having established the three different fates awaiting on Judgement
Day (which I admit is a novel change on merely having two, even though two are
pretty much the same, just one’s the VIP section), the Qur’an moves on to
asking why anyone would not believe in Allah, including the unexpected question
“Have you considered the sperm that you
emit?”
It’s made by God, apparently, and not the process of spermatogenesis involving Leydig and Sertoli cells. Oh, and another good example of how the Qur’an assumes that its audience is male.
The Imminent
61-80
“Have you
considered the water that you drink? Is it you who bring it down from the rain
cloud, or is it We who bring [it] down?”
These verses are basically a litany of things
that could not be explained so therefore it must be God – crops growing from
seed and sometimes failing, rain, water becoming foul, trees growing and fire
burning them. It’s got a nice poetic structure to it, but otherwise, eh. Seen
it all before.
The
Imminent 81-96
“What! Do you take lightly this discourse? And
make your denial of it your vocation?”
Oh hey, that’s me. Although I’d say it’s not so much denial, since
as with the Bible read-through, my intentions were to honestly see what I could
learn from these texts. And the answer so far has been … not a lot. It doesn’t
help when the text itself has a slyly jokey tone to it; I love, for example,
the sarcastic tone when describing what awaits the People of the Left Hand - “then a treat of boiling water”. Mmm!
Enjoy your treat of a good roasting! It’s not my fault, that’s amusing. It’s
like when God passive-aggressively complains about Moses breaking the first set
of commandment tablets in the book of Exodus.
Apart from the idea that the soul passes out of the throat of a
dying man, the rest of this is pretty much a re-iteration of the three
different fates. I haven’t yet pointed out the anti-leftie bias that the People
of the Left Hand are the bad ones; there’s nothing new here, given the roots of
the words “sinister”, "dextrous", "gauche" and "adroit", and obviously it’s only a metaphor, but, you know,
micro-aggressions and all that. I wonder if there is any bias against
left-handed people in some areas of Islam in the same way the left-handed people
in Victorian Britain used to have the left-handedness beaten out of them.
Whereas now they just have to use scissors awkwardly.
Comments
Post a Comment