An Atheist Explores the Bible Part 222: It’s All About Paul (2 Corinthians 11-13)
2 Corinthians 11-13
It’s All About Paul.
It’s All About Paul.
Welcome to another instalment of An Atheist Explores
Sacred Texts (Bible version).
In this series I work my way chapter-by-chapter through
the King James Bible, commenting on it from the point of view of the text as
literature and mythology.
For more detail, see the introductory post http://bit.ly/2F8f9JT
For the online KJV I use, see here http://bit.ly/2m0zVUP
And now:
2 Corinthians 11
“But I fear, lest
by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds
should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.”
Paul expounds at length about all the trials and
tribulations he has been through – shipwrecks, beatings, humiliation and so on
because of his belief. This, he feels, makes him adequate to teaching the
Corinthians the right way to Christ, lest they listen to others and follow “another Jesus, whom we have not preached”.
He seems to be very good at making it all about himself all the time.
There’s an interesting little peek at Judaeo-Christian
mythology when Paul says “for Satan himself
is transformed into an angel of light”. This, I thought, was considered to
be the other way around, with Satan once being Lucifer Morningstar (even though
the original context for this in … Jeremiah? … was that Lucifer Morningstar
referred to a Babylonian king). So Satan has become an angel of light through
the worship of false Christs, according to Paul. Fascinating.
2 Corinthians 12
“Therefore I take
pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecutions, in
distresses for Christ's sake: for when I am weak, then am I strong.”
This is still about Paul, and he seems to me to be
spinning excuses for not visiting the Corinthians, dressed up in some oxymorons
about weakness being strength. Paul tries to make himself humble, whilst at the
same time admonishing the Corinthians for their behaviour, possibly also in
them not asking for him to come to them sooner – “I am become a fool in glorying; ye have compelled me: for I ought to
have been commended of you: for in nothing am I behind the very chiefest
apostles, though I be nothing” – or for asking for him to come to them in
place of Titus and his other deputies. I can’t really tell.
Is there any Christian philosophy buried in this chapter?
Suffering is a good thing, make your weakness your strength etc. because it
means that God loves you more. Or something.
2 Corinthians 13
“Therefore I write
these things being absent, lest being present I should use sharpness, according
to the power which the Lord hath given me to edification, and not to
destruction.”
It’s better for us both, says Paul, that I write to you
rather than visit in person, because I might say something that I shouldn’t and
that would upset you and be bad for my soul. There’s more here about weakness
being strength – “For though he was
crucified through weakness, yet he liveth by the power of God. For we also are
weak in him, but we shall live with him by the power of God toward you.”
This seems to me to be a bit of sophistry and doesn’t make a lot of sense. It’s
not exactly spiritual aikido.
Ah well. The chapter ends with a sign-off, saying that
this epistle was written by Titus and Lucas. As with the previous epistles, I
wonder if that means that they transcribed what Paul dictated, if they added
their own bits to Paul’s original, or if the whole thing was written by them in
Paul’s name. It makes it a bit difficult to work out whose ideas this epistle
contains.
And that’s it for 2 Corinthians. There wasn’t as much
theology or philosophy in that one as in the previous two – most of it seemed
to be Paul excusing himself for not coming to Corinth and for trying to turn
his absence into a good thing, all the while boasting (even using that word)
whilst trying to make himself out as humble. It’s an odd piece of writing, on the
whole.
Comments
Post a Comment