An Atheist Explores the Bible Part 218: The Christian Way to do Food and Sex, According to Paul (1 Corinthians 6-10)
1 Corinthians 6-10
The Christian Way to do Food and Sex, According to Paul.
To do so, Paul says, he has become “all things to all men”, being a Jew to the Jews, weak to the weak, with and without (religious) law depending on his audience. He’s basically admitting to playing to his audience, which is fine if it gets the job done, I have no dispute with him over that. One assumes that his faith that he is doing the right thing over-rides any sense that he needs to be steadfast to himself; underneath he’s a showman and I guess he got results.
The Christian Way to do Food and Sex, According to Paul.
Welcome to another instalment of An Atheist Explores
Sacred Texts (Bible version).
In this series I work my way chapter-by-chapter through
the King James Bible, commenting on it from the point of view of the text as
literature and mythology.
For more detail, see the introductory post http://bit.ly/2F8f9JT
For the online KJV I use, see here http://bit.ly/2m0zVUP
And now:
1 Corinthians 6
“Dare
any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and
not before the saints?”
Paul, rather
dangerously I think, tells the Corinthians that because “the saints”, by which I think he means Christians in general, will
“judge the world” and “judge angels” that they have little
right or need to become involved with earthly laws. I guess here he’s trying to
persuade them not to become embroiled in suits against one another, but there’s
a hint that he considers them to be above mortals laws as well.
The rest is
mainly self-abnegatory stuff, ascetism in the name of religion. “[…] Know ye not that your body is the
temple of the Holy Ghost”, he says, and so don’t defile the temple with
fornication. Avoid harlots – becoming “one
flesh” with a harlot is not like becoming “one spirit” with Christ. Paul has a go at “the effeminate”, and possibly his reference to “abusers of themselves with mankind” is
another homophobic reference. Hang about, though. Where does Jesus say anything
against “the effeminate”? I know it’s
against Levitican law for a man to dress in women’s clothing, but there’s
nothing in the prior Bible about being a bit camp. I suspect Paul of fulfilling
Haggard’s Law here.
1 Corinthians 7
“Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto
me: It is good for a man not to touch
a woman.”
Evidently the
Corinthians wrote to Paul concerning marriage and/or relationships, and here he
spells out his thoughts on the matter, which seem surprisingly egalitarian
considering my memory was of him being against pretty much anything temporal.
To whit: If
you want to marry, that’s fine. It’s better not to and to remain celibate, but
if you can’t do that, at least get married. You can marry a non-believer and
they have no obligations to convert; any children are automatically blessed
because at least one parent is a believer, and if the non-believer leaves,
well, no big loss. Ideally you should not divorce, but if you do, don’t remarry
unless your ex is dead. Note that it’s unclear what the actual status of
marriage is in legal terms. The word “divorce” is not actually used – Paul uses
biblical terms like “put aside” or,
simply, “leave”. It may be that the
whole arrangement is merely a verbal and practical one, as it was for a long
time.
Paul advises,
however, that those who are unmarried have more time for spiritual matters and
less time for temporal matters, particularly aimed at women. There’s some stuff
about virgins and servants but its equally as equivocating.
1 Corinthians 8
“But
meat commendeth us not to God: for neither, if we eat, are we the better;
neither, if we eat not, are we the worse”
This short
chapter almost sounds like Paul is advocating vegetarianism, but for two
things. Firstly, although he is recommending against eating “meat”, bear in mind that “meat” in the KJV quite often refers to
simply food of all kinds, particularly bread and fruit. Also, Paul is
specifically talking about offerings to idols, and the eating thereof. Through
some kind of convoluted logic, Paul asserts that (1) weak-minded men eat the
food offered to idols. (2) by encouraging this, you are condemning the
weak-minded person to a life without the spiritual truth of Christ, (3)
therefore I won’t eat meat (and here, Paul also uses the term “flesh” making it more likely that he’s
talking about actual meat meat) in case it encourages others to eat offerings
and be damned. Yeah. Not sure that quite follows, but if it makes you happy.
1 Corinthians 9
“For though I preach the gospel, I have nothing to
glory of: for necessity is laid upon me; yea, woe is unto me, if I preach not
the gospel!”
What do you get out of all this, somebody has
evidently asked Paul. Well, he replies, some people might decide to take
advantage of their position of leadership, but not me. I do it because I have
to and knowing that I have preached the gospels is its own reward. And possibly
some of that cake, please.
To do so, Paul says, he has become “all things to all men”, being a Jew to the Jews, weak to the weak, with and without (religious) law depending on his audience. He’s basically admitting to playing to his audience, which is fine if it gets the job done, I have no dispute with him over that. One assumes that his faith that he is doing the right thing over-rides any sense that he needs to be steadfast to himself; underneath he’s a showman and I guess he got results.
1 Corinthians 10
“The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the
communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the
communion of the body of Christ?”
Again Paul
makes a virtue of being an everyman trying to please the masses. Here, he
compares the communion bread and wine with food sacrifices made to pagan gods,
and decides that they aren’t the same because of the god to whom they are
dedicated. His God is the true one and so it’s okay to drink metaphorical
blood.
However, says
Paul, if you end up being asked to dine with a pagan, just be polite and go
along with it. Possibly this is meant to impress by example, or maybe it’s just
an attempt not to rock the boat. Either way, Paul says don’t be too dogmatic in
following rules in pursuit of your faith – God knows if you mean well or not.
Comments
Post a Comment