An Atheist Explores the Apocrypha Part 35: War Elephants, A Bit of Light Slaughter, Too Many Antiochuses, and a Massive Plot Twist (1 Maccabees 6-10)
1 Maccabees 6-10
War Elephants, A Bit of Light Slaughter, Too Many Antiochuses, and
a Massive Plot Twist.
In this series I work my way chapter-by-chapter through the Old
Testament Apocrypha, commenting on it from the point of view of the text as
literature and mythology.
For the online KJV I use, see here http://bit.ly/2m0zVUP
“And upon the beasts were there strong towers of wood, which
covered every one of them, and were girt fast unto them with devices: there
were also upon every one two and thirty strong men, that fought upon them,
beside the Indian that ruled him”
1 Maccabees 7
“There
came unto him all the wicked and ungodly men of Israel, having Alcimus, who was
desirous to be high priest, for their captain”
On the Seleucid side, a man named Demetrius becomes the next king, and he is petitioned by Alcimus, an ambitious Israelites who, it would appear, desires the power of the high priesthood above any kind of patriotic loyalty to Israel.
Alcimus asks for Demetrius’ aid in defeating Judas, and the king sends his friend Bacchides, “who ruled beyond the flood” (which I assume means somewhere across the Mediterranean) as a general. Alcimus and Bacchides make peaceful overtures to the Judean rebels, and the Assideans agree to meet them on the basis that “One that is a priest of the seed of Aaron is come with this army, and he will do us no wrong”. Of course, Alcimus and Bacchides were faking it and kill sixty Assideans whereupon the rebels realise that “There is neither truth nor righteousness in them; for they have broken the covenant and oath that they made”.
Bacchides does a bit of light massacring, mainly it would seem among his own people (“many of the men that had forsaken him, and certain of the people also, and when he had slain them, he cast them into the great pit”) before leaving Alcimus in charge and going back to Demetrius.
Alcimus doesn’t do very well at stopping Judas take vengeance and so he goes back to the king to ask for more help; this time the king sends Nicanor. Nicanor tries exactly the same tactics as Bacchides, offering to meet Judas under a truce that he has no intention of honouring. Judas isn’t going to be caught the same way twice, battle is joined and Nicanor comes off worse. Nicanor retreats within the walls of Jerusalem and mocks the priests when they try to present with offerings, instead threatening to burn down the temple if Judas isn’t handed over to him. I don’t think that’s going to go well with him.
And so it goes. Nicanor meets reinforcements from Syria but is met in the field by Judas’ men and defeated. As Nicanor runs away his troops are harried by Israelites with a grudge and wiped out. Nicanor loses his head and his right hand which are hung outside the walls of Jerusalem and the day this happens, the thirteenth of Adar, becomes a holiday (The Day of Nicanor, apparently).
1
Maccabees 8
“Now
Judas had heard of the Romans, that they were mighty and valiant men, and such
as would lovingly accept all that joined themselves unto them, and make a
league of amity with all that came unto them”
The chapter opens with lengthy praise of the Romans, how they command land from Spain to India, always defeating those who oppose them (including Antiochus with an army of elephants) but help those who support them, “Yet for all this none of them wore a crown or was clothed in purple”. It even praises the senate system; “Moreover how they had made for themselves a senate house, wherein three hundred and twenty men sat in council daily, consulting alway for the people, to the end they might be well ordered: And that they committed their government to one man every year, who ruled over all their country, and that all were obedient to that one, and that there was neither envy nor emmulation among them”. Leaving aside the rather rosy view that the Roman Senators had no envy amongst them, I have to wonder how the Jews would see this. On the one hand it must be strange compared to the many years of sacred kings that they themselves had, and the succession of foreign rulers. A land without a king? How strange. And yet also they come from a tradition without kings. The Jews would have been bought up on stories of the Judges, and of the Patriarchs; leaders when needed but ultimately under the same Law of God as everyone else. And the Maccabees themselves seem like a fairly egalitarian merit-based group. So possibly the apparent equality of the Romans as much as their military might appealed to them. I can’t help but think, though, that the idea of bringing in gentiles to protect people covenanted with God must have had its detractors.
Anyway, after singing the praises of the Romans, Judas chooses Eupolemus the son of John, the son of Accos, and Jason the son of Eleazar to send as envoys to Rome, and the Romans are very supportive, making a treaty on brass plaques declaring “Good success be to the Romans, and to the people of the Jews, by sea and by land for ever: the sword also and enemy be far from them”. The treaty says that if either party is attacked, the other will provide military aid and also refuse any kind of assistance to the enemy – “Neither shall victuals be given to them that take part against them, or weapons, or money, or ships, as it hath seemed good to the Romans; but they shall keep their covenants, and that without deceit”. Also they have sent word to Demetrius already telling him to leave the Jews alone – “Wherefore thou made thy yoke heavy upon our friends and confederates the Jews? If therefore they complain any more against thee, we will do them justice, and fight with thee by sea and by land.”
Now, knowing what comes in future with the Roman occupation of Jerusalem and later the Jewish Wars under Vespasian, I wonder if this wasn’t in the end a bit like inviting a vampire into your house. It’s going to be interesting how this alliance with the Romans pans out.
1
Maccabees 9
“Then Judas said, God forbid that I should do
this thing, and flee away from them: if our time be come, let us die manfully
for our brethren, and let us not stain our honour.”
Holy Ned Stark! We’re 9 chapters into the 16-chapter First Book of Maccabees, and Judas Maccabee has snuffed it!
I’m guessing that perhaps Second Maccabees is going to be a retelling rather than an extension, but I can’t be sure.
So, Judas goes into battle against Bacchides, but most of his men desert him and he’s left with 800 against 22,000, so it’s no wonder that he loses. The Judean rebels choose his brother Jonathon to lead them instead, and the rest of this chapter covers a variety of incidents under his leadership.
For starters, Bacchides is rooting out the rebels, and “using them despitefully”, which sounds like a euphemism for torture to me. Another of Judas’ brothers, John, is sent to try and get help from the Nabathites (whoever they are), but is killed by the children of Jambri (whoever they are). Jonathon takes vengeance by slaughtering people at a wedding (and this is… a good thing?) – “Thus was the marriage turned into mourning, and the noise of their melody into lamentation”.
Jonathon and Bacchides fight a battle on the banks of the Jordan, but the text suggests that it’s indecisive. Jonathon has to swim across the river to escape, but not before inflicting heavy losses on Bacchides. Meanwhile a man called Alcimus tries to pull down part of the Temple, the “wall of the inner sanctuary” but evidently has a stroke, when “his mouth was stopped and he was taken with a palsy”.
1 Maccabees
10
“So in
the seventh month of the hundred and sixtieth year, at the feast of the
tabernacles, Jonathan put on the holy robe, and gathered together forces, and
provided much armour.”
Firstly, he gets caught in what seems to me a power struggle
within the Seleucids, with Alexander son of Antiochus Epiphanes on one side,
and Demetrius on the other.
Comments
Post a Comment