An Atheist Explores the Bible Part 196: Salt Salt Salt Salt (Mark 6-10)
Mark 6-10
Salt Salt Salt Salt.
Salt Salt Salt Salt.
Welcome to another instalment of An Atheist Explores
Sacred Texts (Bible version).
In this series I work my way chapter-by-chapter through
the King James Bible, commenting on it from the point of view of the text as
literature and mythology.
For more detail, see the introductory post http://bit.ly/2F8f9JT
For the online KJV I use, see here http://bit.ly/2m0zVUP
And now:
Mark 6
“But Jesus said
unto them, A prophet is not without honour, but in his own
country, and among his own kin, and in his own house.”
More episodes from the life of Jesus,
told in Mark’s more succinct fashion compared to Matthew, again with a lot less
reported speech from Jesus, apart from a few lines of instruction here and
there.
Jesus is teaching in the synagogue, and
people are amazed at his wisdom (which Mark sneakily avoids actually telling
us), but also because this is presumably Nazareth (we are only told that it is
is Jesus’ “own country”) they’re not
convinced that the carpenter’s son should be wise in religion, hence Jesus’
riposte given above.
Next, Jesus sends out the disciples in
pairs to spread the word and cast out evil spirits, but to “shake the dust from their feet” when they
leave a house if their word has not been heard, as a sign of contempt. There’s
more dashing around the Sea of Galilee being followed by multitudes, and here
we get the miracle of the bread and fish, as well as Jesus walking on the sea
to where his disciples are caught in a storm in a boat. In Mark, there seems to
be a lot of occasions where Jesus and the disciples preach from a boat or ship
just off the shore, which I guess would actually make a fairly good stage from
which to address a beach full of people. Also in this chapter Mark jumps back
in time to the death of John the Baptist, killed by Herod due to the wrangling
of his wife and her daughter.
Mark
7
“Then the Pharisees and scribes asked him,
Why walk not thy disciples according to the tradition of the elders, but eat
bread with unwashen hands?”
The Pharisees criticise Jesus and His followers for poor
hygiene, to which Jesus replies “There is nothing from without a man, that entering into him can defile
him: but the things which come out of him, those are they that defile the man”.
Things that come out of a man include “evil
thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, thefts, covetousness, wickedness,
deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness”. Which
is all very well, but evidently Jesus is a theologian and not a microbiologist.
Jesus also heals the daughter of a
Greek woman, and a deaf/mute man, the latter perhaps as much a metaphor as it
then becomes said that “he maketh
both the deaf to hear, and the dumb to speak”.
Mark 8
“But when he had
turned about and looked on his disciples, he rebuked Peter, saying, Get thee behind me, Satan: for thou savourest not the things that
be of God, but the things that be of men.”
There’s another mass-feeding in this
chapter; as in Matthew the miracle of loaves and fish (in this case, just
loaves, it seems), is repeated. And it evidently has some deeper meaning, as Jesus
warns the disciples to “beware the leaven
of the Pharisees” and they, to His annoyance, go on about having no bread.
Jesus complains about them not understanding what it means that twelve and
seven baskets of bread respectively were got from a small number of loaves, but
I’ll admit the meaning is lost on me. Spiritual enlightenment is an unlimited
resource? Something dubious and numerological? (I really hope not). Anyway,
here the story turns to the next phase, as Jesus gets the disciples to name Him
as Christ (rather than John the Baptist, Elijah or another reborn prophet), and
warns them that He will suffer, die and rise after three days. It gets a little
culty at the end, with Jesus basically saying that the most blessed is the
person that gives up everything to follow Him.
Mark
9
“And after six days Jesus taketh with him Peter, and James, and John, and leadeth
them up into an high mountain apart by themselves: and he was transfigured
before them.”
The chapter starts with another version of the vision
given to the select disciples on the mountaintop, where Moses and Elijah appear
alongside Jesus, and then a voice from the clouds proclaims Jesus as its son.
It’s around this point that Jesus begins to get a bit
testy and impatient with His disciples. There is an incident here where the
disciples have failed to cast out a devil possessing a young boy, causing Jesus
to lament “O faithless
generation, how long shall I be with you? how long shall I suffer you?”,
which I read as “I can’t leave you guys
to do anything.” Then later the disciples get into an argument about who is
the best, and here some of the words in Matthew make a bit more sense,
concerning “the first shall be last and
the last shall be first”. Here it is given as “If any man desire to be first, the same shall be last of all, and
servant of all”, and in context it’s clearer, don’t try to put yourself
forward as leader. How that idea gibes with the fact that, earlier in the
chapter, only Peter, James and John get to see the transfiguration, I don’t
know. There’s more stuff about cutting offending parts off your body, ending
with “Salt is good: but if the salt have lost his
saltness, wherewith will ye season it? Have salt in yourselves, and have peace
one with another”. Salt salt salt salt. Yep, doesn’t look like a proper
word any more.
Mark
10
“Verily
I say unto you, Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little
child, he shall not enter therein.”
This chapter includes a lot of direct
speech from Jesus, unusual for Mark so far, and is very similar to the
equivalent sections in Matthew. Jesus debates divorce with the Pharisees, Jesus
tells the disciples to “suffer the little
children to come unto me”, Jesus councils the young man to give obey the
commandments and to give up all he owns. Here, James and John ask Jesus
directly to sit at his side in heaven, it’s not their mother that asks on their
behalf as it is in Matthew, but the upshot is the same. Considering most of
this chapter is linked by the theme of how to get into the kingdom of heaven,
as well as the oncoming fate of Jesus, it ends rather incongruously on the
healing of a blind man. Only the man’s name, Bartimaeus, son of Timaeus, is of
interest as it seems to lend weight to “Barrabbas” being “Son of Abbas (father)”,
if that means anything.
Comments
Post a Comment