An Atheist Explores the Bhagavad Gita Part 19: All The Best Ways To Be (Yog through the Perfection of Renunciation and Surrender (Mokṣha Sanyās Yog))

 Chapter Eighteen: Yog through the Perfection of Renunciation and Surrender (Mokṣha Sanyās Yog)

All The Best Ways To Be.

 Welcome to the next instalment of An Atheist Explores Sacred Texts (Bhagavad Gita).

In this series I work my way chapter-by-chapter through the Bhagavad Gita, commenting on it from the point of view of the text as literature and mythology.

 For more detail, see the introductory post https://bit.ly/2XAch2A

For the online Bhagavad Gita that I use, see here https://www.holy-bhagavad-gita.org/

 And now:

 Mokṣha Sanyās Yog

“The Supreme Divine Personality said: Giving up of actions motivated by desire is what the wise understand as sanyās. Relinquishing the fruits of all actions is what the learned declare to be tyāg.”

 This is a long chapter, and something of a summary of what has gone before. It’s also broken up into several topics, all ultimately related to the way of thinking and acting that will both lead to a virtuous life (in the sattva mode) and also lead a person to Krishna.

 First, Krishna expounds on what should and shouldn’t be renounced. It’s not renouncing actions per se that is good, because one should not renounce actions such as sacrifice, charity and penance, as these are “purifying even for those who are wise”. What matters more is to become detached from the outcomes of the actions, not the actions themselves. Good, bad or indifferent, one shouldn’t worry or be concerned with how actions turn out, just that one should be sure to act in wisdom (sattva) and not passion (rajas) or, worse, ignorance (tamas). After all, as Krishna points out, “For the embodied being, it is impossible to give up activities entirely”.

 There’s a brief digression about the “factors” involved in any action. With an action, and with knowledge, it basically comes down to subject, object and action, e.g. the observer, the thing observed, and the act of observation. We also get mention of five factors, which are “The body, the doer, the various senses, the many kinds of efforts, and Divine Providence” but, oddly, these aren’t really expounded on much more. Instead the text takes the three factors and looks at how they can be divided between the three modes.

 Time, perhaps, for another table:

 

 

Modes

Factor

Sattva (Goodness)

Rajas (Passion)

Tamas (Ignorance)

Knowledge

A person sees one undivided imperishable reality within all diverse living beings.

One sees the manifold living entities in diverse bodies as individual and unconnected.

One is engrossed in a fragmental concept as if it encompasses the whole, and which is neither grounded in reason nor based on the truth.

Action

Free from attachment and aversion, and which is done without desire for rewards, is in the mode of goodness.

Prompted by selfish desire, enacted with pride, and full of stress.

Begun out of delusion, without thought to one’s own ability, and disregarding consequences, loss, and injury to others.

Performer

 Free from egotism and attachment, endowed with enthusiasm and determination, and equipoised in success and failure.

Craves the fruits of the work, is covetous, violent-natured, impure, and moved by joy and sorrow.

Undisciplined, vulgar, stubborn, deceitful, slothful, despondent, and procrastinating.

Intellect

Understands what is proper action and what is improper action, what is duty and what is non-duty, what is to be feared and what is not to be feared, what is binding and what is liberating.

Confused between righteousness and unrighteousness, and cannot distinguish between right and wrong conduct.

Shrouded in darkness, imagining irreligion to be religion, and perceiving untruth to be the truth.

Determination

The steadfast will that is developed through Yog, and which sustains the activities of the mind, the life-airs, and the senses.

The steadfast will by which one holds to duty, pleasures, and wealth, out of attachment and desire for rewards.

One does not give up dreaming, fearing, grieving, despair, and conceit.

Happiness

That which seems like poison at first, but tastes like nectar in the end.  It is generated by the pure intellect that is situated in self-knowledge.

Derived from the contact of the senses with their objects. Such happiness is like nectar at first but poison at the end.

Covers the nature of the self from beginning to end, and which is derived from sleep, indolence, and negligence.

 The next section sets up the Hindu caste system, with four castes; the Brahmin (Priestly caste), Kshatriyas (Warrior caste), Vaishyas (Farmer and Merchant caste), and Shudras (the Worker caste). Notably absent are the casteless, the Dalit; either Krishna considers them unworthy of mention of they were a later addition born of necessity.

 To be a member of a caste is inherent to one’s nature (it’s implied here that this isn’t a matter of being born into a caste, but of finding where one belongs in society), and each caste has a set of actions that brings to doer closer to true happiness and closer to Krishna. That’s handy, isn’t it? Trying to be somebody you’re not brings unhappiness – “It is better to do one’s own dharma, even though imperfectly, than to do another’s dharma, even though perfectly. By doing one’s innate duties, a person does not incur sin”.

 Krishna points out to Arjun that, as a member of the Kshatriya caste, it is his sacred duty to fight – “If, motivated by pride, you think, “I shall not fight,” your decision will be in vain. Your own material (Kshatriya) nature will compel you to fight”. A person cannot go against their caste nature. I’m guessing, though, that you still need to do everything in the sattva mode, even when you have no choice as to whether your correct actions are praying, fighting or dairy farming. Arjun’s doubts about fighting in the upcoming battle are removed – “O infallible one, by your grace my illusion has been dispelled, and I am situated in knowledge. I am now free from doubts, and I shall act according to your instructions”.

 We then return to Sanjay, who’s hair is standing on end from the revelations that he’s seen. I questioned before if he’s got a sneak view of God through his magical spying, and it sounds like he definitely did – “remembering that most astonishing and wonderful cosmic form of Lord Krishna, great is my astonishment, and I am thrilled with joy over and over again”. I wonder, though, because Krishna ought to be aware that they were being spied on, so were these revelations as much for Sanjay’s benefit (and King Dhritarashtra), and while Arjun didn’t know about the eavesdropping, the god certainly did.

 Wherever there is Shree Krishna, the Lord of all Yog, and wherever there is Arjun, the supreme archer, there will also certainly be unending opulence, victory, prosperity, and righteousness. Of this, I am certain,” he says as a closing verse.

 And so that’s where we leave the Bhagavad Gita. Mercifully short compared to the Abrahamic texts, and also pretty succinct in terms of giving a good idea of what it considers to be the right way to live.

More thoughts coming in the next post, where I look back on the text as a whole.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dr Simon Reads... Appendix N. Part One: Poul Anderson

An Atheist Explores the Qur'an Part 121: Closing Thoughts

An Atheist Explores the Bible Part 140: The Fall and Rise of (Slightly Tarty) Cities (Isaiah 21-25)