Susanna 1
Two Lecherous Creeps Get What They Deserve.
Welcome to the next instalment of An Atheist Explores Sacred Texts
(Apocrypha version).
In this series I work my way chapter-by-chapter through the Old
Testament Apocrypha, commenting on it from the point of view of the text as
literature and mythology.
For more detail, see the introductory post http://bit.ly/3aEJ6Q5
For the online KJV I use, see here http://bit.ly/2m0zVUP
Susanna 1
“Now when the people departed away at noon, Susanna went
into her husband's garden to walk”
Let’s get one thing out of the way first; this book
doesn’t feature anybody coming from Alabama with a banjo on their knee. So with
that disappointment passed, on to the story.
It’s a biblical #metoo story. Susanna is the pious
Jewish wife of a man called Joacim who lives in Babylon. Whether or not Joacim
is a Hebrew or not is unclear, but he’s a wealthy man with a nice garden and
lots of people come to his house to conduct business, including a couple of
elders who use Joacim’s house to hear cases.
The two elders see Susanna daily, and both are “inflamed with lust”. There’s a bit of
comedy where the two elders are too ashamed to admit to the other how they
feel, and conspire to send the other away on the pretence of going home, then
doubling back to have their wicked way with Susanna. Of course, they both do
this and run into each other, and so “they
acknowledged their lust: then appointed they a time both together, when they
might find her alone”.
They lie in wait until Susanna enters the garden to
bathe, accompanied by two maids who she sends away. And so the two old pervs
leap out and try to blackmail her. “Behold,
the garden doors are shut, that no man can see us, and we are in love with
thee; therefore consent unto us, and lie with us. If thou wilt not, we will
bear witness against thee, that a young man was with thee: and therefore thou
didst send away thy maids from thee”.
Susanna decides it’s better to call their bluff than
to have to “lie with them” and so she
calls for help. Sure enough the two elders spin their tale about how there was
a young man here but, oh, he got away, and the matter is taken to a tribunal
whereupon the people believe the elders, because they are respected members of
the community and Susanna is condemned to death.
But then a young man called Daniel (whether the Daniel of “lion’s den” fame or not
is unclear) shames the people into not giving Susanna a fair trial. A retrial
is called and Daniel questions the two elders separately. I thought at first we
were going to get a very early example of the Prisoner’s Dilemma, but not
quite. Daniel asks them under what kind of tree they found Susanna. One answers
“Under a mastick tree”, the other “Under an holm tree”. And thus the people
see that the two elders have been lying and, as Daniel says, “the angel of God waiteth with the sword to
cut thee in two”.
Maybe not the angel of God but an executioner because
the two elders are killed, everyone praises God, and “From that day forth was Daniel had in great reputation in the sight of
the people”, so I guess he is that Daniel.
That’s a fun book, a very relatable morality tale.
Comments
Post a Comment