An Atheist Explores the Bible Part 138: Morning Stars and Misplaced Satyrs (Isaiah 11-15)
Isaiah 11-15
Morning Stars and Misplaced Satyrs.
Isaiah 12
“Behold, God is my salvation; I will trust, and not be afraid: for the LORD JEHOVAH is my strength and my song; he also is become my salvation.”
Morning Stars and Misplaced Satyrs.
Welcome to another instalment of An Atheist Explores
Sacred Texts (Bible version).
In this series I work my way chapter-by-chapter through
the King James Bible, commenting on it from the point of view of the text as
literature and mythology.
For more detail, see the introductory post http://bit.ly/2F8f9JT
For the online KJV I use, see here http://bit.ly/2m0zVUP
And now:
Isaiah 11
“And in that day
there shall be a root of Jesse, which shall stand for an ensign of the people;
to it shall the Gentiles seek: and his rest shall be glorious.”
The messianic figure that Isaiah describes will come from
the tribe of Jesse, according to the prophecies here. Which is not in itself a
massive stretch – there’s a one in twelve chance that any Israelite would be
able to trace his ancestry to Jesse, it’s a bit like saying he’ll be a
Capricorn.
But snark aside, there’s some great language in this chapter,
much of which seems to have found its way into wider consciousness. Stuff about
the wolf dwelling with the lamb, and I really liked the verse about the
promised figure smiting the earth with the rod of his mouth, and his breath
slaying the wicked – words as the most powerful of weapons. Not only will this
time be a time of peace amongst animals as well as nations, but will be a great
gathering of the Jewish people. And, of note, the quoted line above. The
non-Jews become involved too, which I can only guess forms the basis of Paul’s
mission to widen Christianity from a Jewish sect to a world-wide faith. There’s
still a kind of incongruous mix of a spiritual figure and a geo-political one,
which it feels like Isaiah can’t decide which he is writing about. But then, I
guess, both apply after a fashion.
Isaiah 12
“Behold, God is my salvation; I will trust, and not be afraid: for the LORD JEHOVAH is my strength and my song; he also is become my salvation.”
This is a short chapter. God’s anger has been turned
aside, and Isaiah speaks as a worshipper who is praising God; there’s something
simple and psalm-like in the language of this chapter. I flag up the quoted
text because I’m pretty sure this is used as a form of creed – I wouldn’t be
surprised to find this written on a stained glass window or engraved on a rood
screen, or even on one of those posters you get outside churches. If you look
at it, it kind of doesn’t really mean anything in and of itself, but I can see
it conveying meaning to a worshipper.
Isaiah 13
“Behold, the day of
the LORD cometh, cruel both with wrath and fierce anger, to lay the land
desolate: and he shall destroy the sinners thereof out of it.”
Isaiah prophesies the destruction of Babylon, by the
hosts of God and by earthquake, with the sun and moon and stars going dark in
some apocalyptic vision in which children are killed and women raped. Yes,
charming work in the service of God I must say. This, like some other fire and
brimstone stuff we’ve seen before, is supposed to be a punishment of the wicked
but once again I question the morality of allowing the destruction of those who
are surely innocent. A comment on the realities of war, perhaps. I can imagine
a reading of this over the top of images from post-bomb Hiroshima, which I
think would change the intent and feel of it quite a bit.
And, so much for children safely playing with asps and
cockatrices as in the last chapter. Peace, after the wicked have been punished.
Oh, and speaking of cockatrices, two more mythological creatures crop up here –
the ruins will be inhabited by satyrs and dragons. I wasn’t comfortable with
satyrs as a translation – that’s plainly Greek mythology. Some translations
have it as “wild goats”, which I think has a better feel of desolation.
Besides, satyrs like fertile woodland glades, not ruined cities, as any fule
kno.
Isaiah 14
“How art thou
fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How
art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!”
My surmise of last chapter was correct, in that a “cleansing” needs to take place before
peace can reign. And this is a continuation of the last chapter, telling of how
the glory of Babylon was (or will be) bought low because God desired it to be
so. And then the Assyrians and the Philistines (here also translated as
Palestina) will look to the destruction of Babylon and, basically, know that
they’re next.
But probably the most interesting section of this chapter
is the stuff about “Lucifer”, the star of the morning. To most of us this is
pretty much established as meaning the devil, I think much thanks to Milton.
The figure in this chapter has tried to become equal to God (“I will exalt my throne above the stars of
God”) but gets cast “down to hell, to
the sides of the pit”. But it’s pretty clear from the context that this is
a reference to the king of Babylon; perhaps Star of the Morning or Lightbringer
(literal translation of Lucifer) is some kind of established honorific for the
king (used, I guess, in an ironic fashion by the hostile Isaiah). So much like
the serpent in Eden, here’s a figure who may be a biblical villain but not the biblical villain getting conflated
in later theology with a single representative of evil.
Casting my thoughts wider, the morning star is the planet
Venus, also associated with the Babylonian goddess Ishtar, aka Ashtarte who is
roundly condemned in previous books of the bible. Isaiah himself has already
had a go at women wearing moon-shaped jewellery, so could we be looking at a
manifestation of the ongoing conflict between (patriarchal) Yahweh worship and
(matriarchal) Ishtar worship? Probably not – it would be “daughter of the
morning” and not son. But I might run with that as some pseudo-theological
underpinnings to the adventures of The Preacher!
Or, again, from a purely astronomical viewpoint, Venus
rises in the morning before the sun, shine brightest in the sky but is
ultimately eclipsed by the sun as it rises. Interpreted mythologically it’s a
physical embodiment of the attempt to claim the throne of heaven occupied by
the sun by a usurper. I wonder if there are similar myths in other cultures.
Isaiah 15
“The burden of
Moab. Because in the night Ar of Moab is laid waste, and brought to silence; because in the night
Kir of Moab is laid waste, and brought to
silence;”
The destruction of Moab. This feels likes it has a
different author, I think because it deals a lot more with specific people and
places (“the waters of Nimrim shall be
desolate”), and really doesn’t have such a heft to the language, like somebody
trying and failing to capture the blood and thunder rhetoric of the destruction
of Babylon. Babylon makes sense, in that is, or was, or will be, a nation that
enslaves the Israelites. But Moab has always struck me as a second-fiddle enemy
state, picking around the edges of Israel and Judah but never as effectively as
the Philistines, never really causing any real damage; certainly not the mass
enslavement and destruction of the temple by the Babylonians and Assyrians. So
it feels a bit cheap and petty to include them in a grand prophecy that seems
to deal with the dawn of a new age.
Comments
Post a Comment