An Atheist Explores the Bible Part 53: Saul is caught with his pants down. (1 Samuel 21-25)
1 Samuel 21-25
David frees the city of Keilah from the Philistines, but then Saul comes and besieges him there. Not very well, apparently, as David asks God if the people of Keilah will turn him over to Saul. Gid says yes, so David and his men sneak out of Keilah. Well picketed, Saul.
Saul is caught with his pants down.
Welcome to another instalment of An Atheist Explores
Sacred Texts (Bible version).
In this series I work my way chapter-by-chapter through
the King James Bible, commenting on it from the point of view of the text as
literature and mythology.
For more detail, see the introductory post http://bit.ly/2F8f9JT
For the online KJV I use, see here http://bit.ly/2m0zVUP
And now:
1 Samuel 21
“So
the priest gave him hallowed bread:
for there was no bread there but the shewbread, that was taken from before the
LORD, to put hot bread in the day when it was taken away.”
I have no idea what that quoted verse mean. “to put hot bread in the day when it was
taken away”? Does not parse…
Apart from that, though, this is David visiting Ahimelech
the priest to resupply with bread, and he gets Goliath’s old sword as a weapon.
Then he flees to Gath but, upon hearing the people proclaiming him king becomes
afraid and pretends to be mad. And that’s it (shades of Hamlet).
1 Samuel 22
“And
Saul said unto him, Why have ye conspired against me, thou and the son of
Jesse, in that thou hast given him bread, and a sword, and hast enquired of God
for him, that he should rise against me, to lie in wait, as at this day?”
David moves about, gathering followers amongst the
dispossessed and discontent, and gives his parents over to the king of Moab for
protection.
Meanwhile Saul is on his trail. Doeg the Edomite acts as a grass and mentions that David is at the house of Ahimelech, so Saul goes there
and threatens the priests. No-one is willing to raise a hand against the
priests except Doeg, who kills the priests and everyone in the city of Nob.
Only one son of Ahimelech, named Abiathar, escapes, and tells David what has
happened. David feels guilty because he thinks that his presence in Nob has caused
all the death. So far, all quite a good folk hero narrative.
1 Samuel 23
“Therefore
David enquired of the LORD, saying, Shall I go and smite these Philistines? And
the LORD said unto David, Go, and smite the Philistines, and save Keilah.”David frees the city of Keilah from the Philistines, but then Saul comes and besieges him there. Not very well, apparently, as David asks God if the people of Keilah will turn him over to Saul. Gid says yes, so David and his men sneak out of Keilah. Well picketed, Saul.
David then
goes to hide in some woods near Ziph, but again the Ziphites offer to turn him
over to Saul and he moves on again, this time to somewhere called Maon. Saul
calls off the pursuit when he gets news that those pesky Philistines are
attacking once again. Then David moves to strongholds in Engedi.
Throughout
this, there’s not a lot of sense of popular support of David, apart from
Abiachar the priest and Jonathon who both warn David of Saul’s movements and
give him words of support. These episodes with Saul and David are also
problematic in the light of a belief system that tries to apply everything that
happens to the will of God. If it is God’s will that David should flourish and
Saul fail, and Saul is visited by an “evil spirit” sent by God, what
culpability does either man have for his actions? Can Saul really be blamed if
he is being driven to do the things that he does by God, and can David be
praised for his successes if they are ordained by God?
There is a
school of thought that says, of the second question, exactly – don’t be too
proud, if you’ve succeeded it’s only because God has let you. The flipside to
this, that failures are caused by God, is given less credence, except as
punishment for infractions. Saul’s sin here, I suppose, is that he accepted the
kingship when God didn’t want a king for the Israelites, but he was reluctantly
thrust into the role rather than ruthlessly clawing his way to power in a
Julius Caesar fashion.
1 Samuel 24
“Then Saul took three thousand chosen men out of
all Israel, and went to seek David and his men upon the rocks of the wild
goats.”
After
defeating the Philistines Saul heads after David again, in the fastness of
Engedi. He heads into a cave to “cover his feet” whereupon he is captured by
David and his men. Is this a euphemism for taking a dump? Maybe because they
next verse includes the line “privily” which makes me think “privy”, but it’s a
strange action to perform if it doesn’t mean something else. Also, the ignominy
of being taken by your arch enemy literally with your pants down has a certain
poetic justice to it (c.f. Tywin Lannister).
David cuts of
part of Saul’s robes, then repents any violence. Whatever Saul may have done he
is still the anointed king and David is a shepherd. He tells Saul that he will
leave any matters of vengeance to God, but that he, David, will not harm Saul.
Saul sees that this kind of compassion means that David is more worthy to be
king, and asks only that David not destroy his line (considering the close
friendship between David and Jonathon this is unlikely). Saul is then released.
1 Samuel 25
“And Nabal answered David's servants, and said,
Who is David? and who is
the son of Jesse? there be many servants now a days that break away every man
from his master.”
Samuel dies at
the beginning of this chapter, but the rest of the chapter centres around
David’s dealings with a rich man called Nahal. David sends messengers to ask for supplies from Nahal, who has thousands of sheep, but Nahal refuses, rudely (“Who
is David?”). David is about to attack Nahal to take supplies by force when one
of Nahal’s servants tells his wife Abigail. Abigail takes some supplies to
David and pleads with him not to attack, pitching it that it would dishonour
him to do so, and David relents.
There are
several mentions here to “he that pisseth against the wall”, which in context
would seem to imply men in general, although it may mean more specifically
“unsanitary (i.e. worthless) men”, given the very specific toilet instructions
in Leviticus, also the reference to Nahal as a “son of Belial” (i.e. pillock).
A very lavatorial slant to the last few chapters. Anyway, David and his men
don’t have to kill he that pisseth against the wall. Nahal gets good and drunk
and, the next morning when Abigail tells him of her embassy to David his heart
“became as a stone” and he dies ten days later, saving David from having to do
it. David then marries Abigail, and some other previously unmentioned woman called
Ahinoam. Meanwhile his other wife, Saul’s daughter Michal, has been given to
another man, called Phalti. Traditional Biblical marriage, you see.
Comments
Post a Comment