An Atheist Explores the Bible Part 48: The Biblical Guide to Getting Your Man (Ruth 1-4)
Ruth 1-4
Welcome to another instalment of An Atheist Explores Sacred Texts (Bible version).
And now:
The Biblical Guide to Getting Your Man.
Welcome to another instalment of An Atheist Explores Sacred Texts (Bible version).
In this series I work my way chapter-by-chapter through
the King James Bible, commenting on it from the point of view of the text as
literature and mythology.
For more detail, see the introductory post http://bit.ly/2F8f9JT
For the online KJV I use, see here http://bit.ly/2m0zVUPAnd now:
Ruth 1
“And
Naomi said unto her two daughters in law, Go, return each to her mother's
house: the LORD deal kindly with you, as ye have dealt with the dead, and with
me.”
I believe this is the only book of the bible named after
a woman (edit: no, there’s Esther), and after all the unpleasantness at the end
of judges it’ll be interesting to get a female perspective.
Elimelech and his wife Naomi leave Bethlehem for Moab to
escape a famine (and there is a hint that this is because of the misrule of the
judges as well), and they have two sons, who take a wife each. However all the
men die in short order, leaving Naomi with her two daughters-in-law Orpah and
Ruth (and am I right in thinking that Oprah Winfrey is named after a misread
version of Orpah?).
Naomi decides to return to Bethlehem and sends her
daughters-in-law back to their homes, because she will have no more sons for
them to marry, but Ruth stays with her and returns to Bethlehem with her.
Orpah, we are left to assume, goes home. Naomi changes her name to Mara, which
perhaps means bitter given the explanation.
Ruth 2
“Then
said Boaz unto Ruth, Hearest thou not, my daughter? Go not to glean in another
field, neither go from hence, but abide here fast by my maidens”
Ruth helps
with the harvest where she catches the eye of Boaz, a kinsman of Naomi. There’s
a sort of courtship going on here, although it’s not that clearly written. Part
of it seems to be showing courtesy to a stranger, as written in Leviticus, but
there’s also a singling out for favour for Ruth by Boaz. There’s also mention a
couple of times that Boaz “had knowledge” of Ruth, although this doesn’t seem
to have happened in the biblical sense, (a.k.a. “entered in unto her”). Well, I
guess that’s what’s going on here, a growing closeness between Ruth and Boaz.
Ruth 3
“And it shall be, when he lieth down, that thou
shalt mark the place where he shall lie, and thou shalt go in, and uncover his
feet, and lay thee down; and he will tell thee what thou shalt do.”
Okay, so it seems that Ruth and Boaz have not yet “known”
each other in that sense, as here she is sent to lie at his feet when he rests,
and he considers her to be a virtuous woman (which I guess she would not be if
they’d done anything else). Boaz gives her some barley to give to her
mother-in-law, but there’s also some strange custom involving a closer kinsman
– possibly this other person has more claim to marry Ruth than Boaz, as far as
I can tell.
Ruth 4
“Then
went Boaz up to the gate, and sat him down there: and, behold, the kinsman of
whom Boaz spake came by; unto whom he said, Ho, such a one! turn aside, sit
down here. And he turned aside, and sat down.”
I guess I was mostly right last chapter – the closer
(un-named) kinsman has a higher claim to Ruth’s hand in marriage, but also the
land left by Naomi’s dead husband and sons, but he eschews it and allows Boaz
to take the land and marry Ruth. Which they do, and have a son Obed, who will
become father of Jesse, father of David.
Okay, so that was a compact little book which I guess
sets up the ancestry of David, but it’s strange that it has a book all to
itself when similar stories are told as part of larger books that follow a
dynasty. And really, not a lot happens; it’s more of an example of courtship
custom and marriage laws than a folk tale, and maybe that is the reason for its
inclusion.
Comments
Post a Comment